Staffing websites that sell to employers, not just candidates.
A staffing website has two visitors who want opposite things. Candidates want jobs and want them fast. Employers want to know you can fill a role they have already failed to fill twice. Almost every agency site is built entirely for the first and then wonders why the second never calls.
What a staffing agency website actually needs
Two front doors, built separately
An employer journey and a candidate journey with their own navigation, their own proof and their own calls to action. Trying to serve both with one homepage serves neither.
A job board wired into your ATS
Live sync with Bullhorn, JobDiva, Crelate or Loxo, with structured JobPosting data so roles are eligible for Google Jobs. Manually reposting is where stale listings come from.
Employer pages with time-to-fill proof
Specific numbers: time to fill, submittal to interview ratio, fill rate in your verticals. Hiring managers are comparing agencies on exactly these and most sites offer nothing but adjectives.
Specialization stated clearly
Light industrial, allied health, IT contract, finance and accounting. Generalist positioning competes with every agency in the country on rate alone.
Fast apply, fast screen
Resume parse, a short qualifying step and routing to the right recruiter. Every extra field loses candidates, and in a tight market the candidate is the inventory.
Compliance content that reassures
Worker classification, E-Verify, state registration and insurance posture. For contract and contract-to-hire this is a real procurement question, not filler.
What most staffing agency websites get wrong
Built entirely for candidates
The job board dominates and the employer, who is the one paying, gets a contact form. The highest-value visitor is given the least.
Job listings that have been filled for months
Nothing destroys credibility faster, with both sides. It happens whenever the board is not actually connected to the ATS.
No numbers anywhere
“We deliver exceptional talent” is what every competitor says. Fill rate and time to fill are what a hiring manager is actually weighing.
Generalist positioning
Claiming to staff every role in every industry reads as staffing nobody particularly well, and it puts you in a pure rate comparison.
What good looks like.
Perfect for you if…
Good to know.
What does a staffing agency website cost?
$6,000 to $14,000 with ATS integration, a job board and separate employer and candidate journeys. Multi-vertical firms with several brands run higher.
Can it connect to Bullhorn?
Yes. Bullhorn, JobDiva, Crelate and Loxo all expose job feeds. We publish with structured JobPosting markup so roles can appear in Google Jobs.
Should job listings be public?
Usually yes, because they bring in search traffic, but we can hide client names and keep confidential searches off the public board.
What metrics should we publish?
Whatever you can stand behind: time to fill, fill rate, submittal to interview ratio, retention at ninety days. Approximate and honest beats precise and invented.
How long does it take?
Seven to eleven weeks, with the ATS integration and field mapping usually the longest step.
We build for these too.
Websites for law firms
Law firm websites that bring in cases, not just compliments.
See the pageWebsites for real estate
Real estate websites that capture the seller.
See the pageWebsites for CPA firms
CPA websites built for the client you actually want.
See the pageWebsites for contractors
Contractor websites that book the estimate.
See the pageReady to get started?
Tell us what you need and we'll come back within one working day with ideas and a clear, fixed price. No obligation.